Covid Pandemic Revisited

The Covid pandemic has caused an enormous amount of worldwide havoc and harm. We still don’t know all that we need to know about it. However, two and a half years with covid has given us much more information.

We have learned that the virus can infect anyone. Some people are more likely than others to suffer serious complications. Some may die. Those who are most vulnerable include people with pre-existing chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, kidney disease, auto-immune disorders, and obesity.

This “vaccine” does not prevent infection. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated people can be infected and can spread the virus. We are told that vaccination of the vulnerable may decrease the severity of illness and occurrence of death. More evidence is needed to confirm this.

The covid-19 “vaccine” is not a true vaccine. It is a gene-modifying invention intended to provide protection against infection. This technology was not previously approved in a “vaccine” for humans. We do not know what long-term consequences may occur.

Corners were cut and safety concerns minimized in the rush to get a gene-modifying “vaccine” approved. Pfizer documents released by court order reveal a cover-up of much damaging information. As more of these documents are released, scientists are finding serious flaws in Pfizer’s research process. Pfizer wanted to keep these documents from public disclosure for 75 years.

An analysis done by British Medical Journal Editor Dr. Peter Doshi and colleagues found that these “vaccines” are more likely to put you in a hospital with a serious adverse event than keep you out by protecting you from COVID.

The recent approval of the Emergency Use Authorization of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s “vaccines” for infants and young children troubles many public health experts. The rate of covid-related hospitalization for children aged 5-11 is less than one in a million. As Dr. Martin Makary from Johns Hopkins University asks, why give a “vaccine” with known risks to healthy children whose risks are very low?

Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is granted only in serious emergency situations. The FDA website explains that under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met.

The use of unapproved medical products essentially means that their use is experimental in the situation involved. Questions about long-term safety issues have not been resolved. The FDA believes they are safe enough to use in emergency situations, pending clearance with more thorough testing. Yet thorough testing for safety is precisely what has been lacking. We don’t know what long-term issues may come up.

Based on all the data (pro and con) that I have researched, I don’t believe that these gene-modifying “vaccines” are advisable. Pfizer papers released so far have unveiled serious adverse data that Pfizer wanted to keep secret. Hundreds of thousands of Pfizer documents that are yet to be disclosed will reveal much more hidden data.

Everyone must make his or her own decisions about how to respond to these issues. It is not an easy decision to make. Without being critical of anyone, I hope all concerned will examine emerging data carefully in deciding about the use of these “vaccines” in children or in booster doses for those previously vaccinated.

Share